Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1031 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - CA$69.88 vs CA$228.88
- Up to 62% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-6700 - CA$0.49 vs CA$1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 24% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3220 - 176 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
142
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16457 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
176
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.3/FPS
37%
Price, CA$
CA$228.88
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$228.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16457 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |