Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3220 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3220 is 50 days older than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than FX-8350 - 237 vs 235 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than FX-8350 - CA$69.88 vs CA$182.45
- Up to 63% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-8350 - CA$0.29 vs CA$0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
237
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17218 minutes ago
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |