Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2101 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 49% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-3210 - 110 vs 74 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 24 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
110
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76982 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
39.95290423861852%
Multi-Core
1018
13.657096860745908%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |