Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2132 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 14% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-3110M - 79 vs 69 FPS
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
79
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |