Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2148 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3110M - 168 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
168
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |