Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i3-2328M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1825 days newer than Core i3-2328M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2328M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-2328M - 201 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2328M - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$201.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$201.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2328M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |