Buy on Amazon
CA$214.83
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 196% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-2500 - 80 vs 27 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - CA$54.96 vs CA$214.83
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-13100F 3.4GHz (4.5 Turbo) 4-Core LGA 1700 Desktop Processor (Raptor Lake)
Buy for CA$214.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75387 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-2500 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.3 GHz 6M 95W LGA1155
Buy for CA$54.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75387 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i5-2500
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2500
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
589
25.85601404741001%
Multi-Core
1695
21.89639581449425%
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Core i5-2500 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
