Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3412 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-4330 - 143 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - CA$63.33 vs CA$218.94
- Up to 69% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-13100F - CA$0.48 vs CA$1.53 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
143
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.53/FPS
31%
Price, CA$
CA$218.94
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$218.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13919 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
132
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$63.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$63.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13910 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Core i3-4330 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |