Buy on Amazon
CA$184.25
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than Core i5-2300 - 287 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - CA$44.35 vs CA$184.25
- Up to 72% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-13100F - CA$0.18 vs CA$0.64 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
287
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$184.25
24%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-13100F 3.4GHz (4.5 Turbo) 4-Core LGA 1700 Desktop Processor (Raptor Lake)
Buy for CA$184.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
253
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$44.35
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2300 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.8 GHz 6M 95W LGA1155
Buy for CA$44.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Core i5-2300 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
