Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3758 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 22 than FX-6100 - 286 vs 249 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - CA$80.8 vs CA$102.99
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$102.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74049 minutes ago
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74049 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |