Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1115G4 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1115G4 is 2871 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1115G4
- Performs up to 11% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8350 - 354 vs 319 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-1115G4 - 8 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
319
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |