Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 88 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - CA$272.84 vs CA$425.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-10850K - CA$1.34 vs CA$2.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i3-10320 - 206 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 20 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$272.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$272.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.06/FPS
65%
Price, CA$
CA$425
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |