Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - CA$274.32 vs CA$385.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-11900 - CA$2.05 vs CA$2.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10320 - 145 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$274.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$274.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.66/FPS
77%
Price, CA$
CA$385
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$385 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |