Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 11% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 122 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$259.45 vs CA$1005.68
- Up to 77% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$2.13 vs CA$9.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 24 vs 8 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$259.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$259.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
110
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.14/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$1005.68
25%
Buy for CA$1,005.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |