Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3090 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 6% better in Deathloop than Core i7-3960X - 180 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - CA$274.32 vs CA$1045.69
- Up to 75% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i7-3960X - CA$1.52 vs CA$6.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$274.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$274.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Buy for CA$1,045.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |