Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3410 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 18% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3240T - 116 vs 98 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75495 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
27.885215221459763%
Multi-Core
971
36.016320474777444%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |