Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6850K is 672 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-6850K - CA$49.99 vs CA$288.62
- Up to 82% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-6850K - CA$0.26 vs CA$1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6850K - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6850K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6850K
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Celeron G4900 - 199 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
191
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.45/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$288.62
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$288.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6850K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |