Buy on Amazon
CA$66.34
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $899
Availability
MSRP in USD: $899
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1095 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$66.34 vs CA$1180.39
- Up to 94% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$0.26 vs CA$4.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3900 - 273 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
256
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18930 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
273
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.32/FPS
6%
Price, CA$
CA$1180.39
5%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X Processor (YD2950XA8AFWOF)
Buy for CA$1,180.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18931 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
