Buy on Amazon
CA$42.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$42.99 vs CA$895.0
- Up to 95% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$0.25 vs CA$4.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3900 - 193 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
170
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
193
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.64/FPS
5%
Price, CA$
CA$895
4%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT 6-core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler
Buy for CA$895 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
