Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 1509 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - CA$21.99 vs CA$1116.1
- Up to 97% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-10920X - CA$0.14 vs CA$4.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 53% better in F1 23 than Celeron G3900 - 240 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
157
65%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$21.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$21.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
240
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.65/FPS
3%
Price, CA$
CA$1116.1
1%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,116.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Skylake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |