Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6850K is 761 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-6850K - CA$41.21 vs CA$250.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i7-6850K - CA$0.19 vs CA$1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-6850K - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6850K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6850K
- Performs up to 5% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G1840 - 224 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
214
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
224
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.12/FPS
16%
Price, CA$
CA$250
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-6850K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |