Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - CA$41.21 vs CA$334.32
- Up to 87% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-11500 - CA$0.18 vs CA$1.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-11500 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G1840 - 238 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
223
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3244 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
238
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$334.32
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$334.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3250 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |