Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2342 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G1820 - 214 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
27.850255246738513%
Multi-Core
825
9.01245357220887%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |