Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 216 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 2% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G1820 - 179 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
