Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1522 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 29% better in FIFA 23 than FX-6350 - 124 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 64 vs 6 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | EPYC |
Vishera | Codename | Naples |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 32 |
6 | Threads | 64 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |