Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is 2170 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Performs up to 14% better in Starfield than FX-6350 - 50 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 15 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
No | Overclockable | No |