Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1306 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1820 - 235 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 64 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
Haswell | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 32 |
2 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |