Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 2787 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 15% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron G1620 - 142 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
28.168044077134986%
Multi-Core
723
15.48511458556436%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
No | Overclockable | No |