Buy on Amazon
CA$420
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-8370 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8370 is 638 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Performs up to 1% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G1610 - 206 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
206
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$420
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-8370 Black Edition 8 Core CPU Processor AM3+ 4300Mhz 125W 16MB FD8370FRHKBOX
Buy for CA$420 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
