Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2223 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 5% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron B830 - 203 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 24 vs 2 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |