Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 4021 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 43% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron B815 - 123 vs 86 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 8 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
123
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.93/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$237.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$237.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |