Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1691 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 15% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron 2955U - 227 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 12 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
227
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |