Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2082 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 16% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron 1037U - 231 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 24 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
231
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |