Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 75 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900T.
Advantages of Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9900T - 590 vs 562 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - CA$199.73 vs CA$277.63
- Up to 31% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9900T - CA$0.34 vs CA$0.49 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$277.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7690 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
590
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$199.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$199.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7416 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9900T | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |