In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-9900T is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 56% faster in Battlefield 6 – 125 vs 80 FPS
- Up to 56% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
125 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9900T vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9900T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
16 MB
48%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9900T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $423.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
