Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9900T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9900T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9900T.
Advantages of Core i9-9900T
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$277.63 vs CA$506.29
- Up to 40% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-14700F - CA$1.83 vs CA$3.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Core i9-9900T - 165 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900T - 28 vs 16 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
152
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$277.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$277.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
165
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.07/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$506.29
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$506.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 294 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9900T | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
16 | Threads | 28 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |