Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 926 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900T.
Advantages of Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900T - 211 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - CA$268.04 vs CA$277.63
- Up to 14% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900T - CA$1.27 vs CA$1.48 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$277.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
211
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$268.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$268.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9900T | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |