Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1352 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900T.
Advantages of Core i9-9900T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 24% better in Starfield than Core i9-9900T - 73 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - CA$270.10 vs CA$277.63
- Up to 21% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-9900T - CA$3.70 vs CA$4.71 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$277.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
73
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$270.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$270.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9900T | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |