Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 677 days newer than Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 43% better in League of Legends than Core i9-10900F - 295 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 48 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
295
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
206
69%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$329.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Chagall | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
48 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |