Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 4300 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 31% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-875K - 119 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
119
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
91
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Chagall | Codename | Lynnfield |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |