Buy on Amazon
CA$885.66
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1752 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8350 - 128 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$209.7 vs CA$885.66
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$885.66
23%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor (YD195XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$885.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
AMD FD8350FRHKBOX FX-8350 FX-Series 8-Core Black Edition
Buy for CA$209.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
