Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - CA$182.45 vs CA$859.58
- Up to 76% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-14900 - CA$1.26 vs CA$5.15 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 15% better in Dead Space than FX-8350 - 167 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
145
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
167
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.15/FPS
24%
Price, CA$
CA$859.58
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$859.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |