Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4570 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1530 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4570.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-4570 - 103 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$116.15 vs CA$395.9
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
103
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$395.9
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$395.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 298 minutes ago
Buy for CA$116.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 298 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1093
93.10051107325383%
Multi-Core
3066
43.950688073394495%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-4570 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |