Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1439 days newer than Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i3-4130T - 150 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
150
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |