Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 761 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - CA$181.91 vs CA$218.88
- Up to 12% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-6700K - CA$0.98 vs CA$1.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 198 vs 185 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 91 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
185
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$181.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$181.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19428 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
198
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
88%
Price, CA$
CA$218.88
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19427 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |