Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 16% better in F1 22 than FX-6100 - 289 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - CA$80.8 vs CA$694.51
- Up to 87% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 9 7950X - CA$0.32 vs CA$2.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 95 vs 170 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
289
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.4/FPS
13%
Price, CA$
CA$694.51
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$694.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2172 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
249
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$80.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |