Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2929 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$80.8 vs CA$452.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-10900X - CA$0.43 vs CA$2.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 13% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-6100 - 211 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 20 vs 6 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
187
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$80.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2151 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
211
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.15/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$452.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$452.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Zambezi | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |