Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - CA$84.01 vs CA$930.29
- Up to 87% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - CA$0.94 vs CA$7.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 47% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6100 - 131 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
89
67.93893129770993%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.1/FPS
13.239436619718308%
Price, CA$
CA$930.29
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$930.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |