Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 3174 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 45% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-6200 - 175 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$498.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$498.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 3 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |