Buy on Amazon
CA$895
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2589 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8350 - 136 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - CA$182.45 vs CA$895.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 3950X - CA$1.59 vs CA$6.58 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.58/FPS
24%
Price, CA$
CA$895
20%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-core, 32-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor, without Cooler
Buy for CA$895 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
115
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8350 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 4 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
| Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
