Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2814 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$209.7 vs CA$551.77
- Up to 60% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$0.72 vs CA$1.81 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Resident Evil Village than FX-8350 - 305 vs 292 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
292
95.73770491803279%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$209.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$209.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
305
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.81/FPS
39.77900552486188%
Price, CA$
CA$551.77
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$551.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |